I never played hockey.
Alright, so after getting that nearly
blasphemous-for-a-Minnesotan statement out of the way it is important
to understand that sometimes it takes an outsider to provide
necessary insight. Especially for a bold question like:
Why does the NHL allow – even
encourage – fighting?
Throwing a punch in the NBA,
MLB,
or NFL
will get a player a several game suspension, a fine, and a one-on-one
conversation with the commish. But in the NHL, throwing multiple
punches is typically penalized with a several-minute reprimand in
the penalty box. Then, the fighters are back on the ice, as if
nothing happened.
What's even more astonishing is that
hockey has a position - “the enforcer” - for the team instigator
and brawler. Minnesotans need to look no farther than former Wild
enforcer Derek Boogaard* for an example of what it means – on and
off the ice – to be an enforcer.
*Check out the extensive series
(part
1, part
2, part
3) from the New York Times on the
life and death of Boogaard which makes the case that Boogaard’s
role as an enforcer was a contributing factor to his death at 28
years old. The author said that it was the NYT’s
“biggest
multi-department compilation ever.”
Around the same time of Boogaard's death, two other enforcers (Rick
Rypien and Wade Belak) died of similar, fighting-induced, causes.
It makes no sense that an activity
considered “extracurricular” in every other major sport is
treated as a part of the game in hockey. The fact that fighting is
penalized within the game rather than through league fines and
penalties implies that the NHL considers breaking someone’s nose is
equivalent to pushing a punter or swearing at a ref.* It seems
strange that there would a difference this great between the US's
major sports.
*After three “fight instigator”
penalties a player receives a two game suspension. Which is some
incentive to not start a fight, but not every fight has an instigator
and not every instigator gets penalized for it.
However, most hockey-ites see no
problem with this disconnect. Rather, they see fighting as “just
a part of the game.” That is exactly what's so unsettling
about it: it is a part of the game to obliterate an opponent’s
face with a fist. It allows players to treat opponents as creatures
rather than fellow athletes.
Maybe Minnesotans should lend some
credence to the opinions of our neighbors to the north – even the State of Hockey
has to bow to people from Canada* on the subject of hockey. However,
3 years ago, a poll said that about 60%
of Canadians would like to see fighting
penalized with suspensions and fines rather than a respite in the
penalty box. These opinions don't quite square with the opinions of
NHL team management. After a Canadian semi-pro player died as a
result of a on-ice fight injury, the NHL general managers to discuss
the matter. In a poll of the GM's leading up to the discussion, all
but two said that the in-game
penalties on fighting should be loosened.
Really?!? A player just died because of fighting, and league
officials thought that it would be a good idea to remove the
already-loose disincentives to fighting. Wow.
* Or, North Montana.....at least
according to Meet the Robinsons.
Maybe the differing opinions between
Canadians and management suggests that there is money to be made in
fighting. This has to be the only reason that the NHL allows
fighting to go on. That, and the fact that it is engrained
into the culture of the game. Which actually may be harder to
overcome than the revenue lost from a fighting ban. Persuading hockey
fans that fighting is not an integral
part of the game
will take more than 30-second commercial sports or pros championing
sportsmanship.
It will, more than
likely, take time. Time for the league to convince its patrons that
fighting can fall by the wayside while the core of the sport remains.
Or, for more players to die from the consequences of fighting.
Or,
there's a third option. Consumer advocate Ralph Nader. His newest
cause is combating fighting in hockey. He sent a
letter
to the the NHL commissioner requesting a ban. I have only been alive
for a fraction of Nader's campaigning. But, in that time I've learned
that he is not someone to pick a fight with.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it civil.