I like the phrase “all politics is local.” The things that
are most important are the things that are closest to you. Incidentally, those
are often things you know the most about and have the most power to influence.
That’s why I spent a semester as an editor begging UW-Madison students to stop
writing about Israel-Palestine and another year on an editorial board sounding
off on things like the what to name the new union and the University muscling Brothers Bar and Grill off its corner.
Being able to recognize issues you want to influence is only half the battle –
you have to know whom to lobby to make your voice heard.
That’s why campus newspapers should write editorials aimed
at chancellors and not presidents. And that’s why I cringed when I picked up my paper last week.
I’m all for students’ rights and peace land and bread and saving Darfur*. However, the recent Ann Arbor rally in support of the
UC-Davis students struck a chord with me not because of the cause, but because the
organizers didn’t understand the importance of staying local.
* Wait, I’m two years
late on the Darfur thing? And peace land and bread was the slogan during the
Russian Revolution? Well comb my mustache and call me Trotsky – I guess I need
to get out more.
In what can best be described as a vigil in favor of a rally
mimicking a protest* last Tuesday night, students gathered on campus to show
solidarity with #Occupy** protestors at UC-Davis who where pepper sprayed by
campus police. The Ann Arbor vigil was reportedly also protesting an incident at
UC-Berkeley which is just bizarre considering that it took place two years ago,
back when people still cared about Darfur.
*Got that?
**Is the hashtag part
of the title? I don’t know, but I’m going with yes – it will cause nightmares
for librarians trying to alphabetize it.
The problem here isn’t the what or the why of the vigil. The
problem is the where. How many UC-Davis campus officials walk through the Diag?
Was there some demand on the UM administration? Don’t pepper spray me bro?
Protests are simple.
Good protests are not. You need to find an issue, craft a position, and then
make that position known to the appropriate people. And that third point is a
really important one that the Tuesday vigil seems to have missed the boat on.
In general, protests in favor of other protests are a tricky
thing. Nevertheless, they can be done. Also last week,
a group of students identified a problem (the extensive power of the Egyptian
military in civil matters), crafted a position (the U.S. government should stop
supporting them), and rallied to influence stakeholders (U.S. voters). Rather
than calling for a decrease in the power of the Egyptian military, they stayed
local and demanded something their audience could (at least theoretically)
deliver – a change is U.S. policy. It may not be exactly what Sam Clegg meant
when he would mutter “keep it local” to me through clenched teeth, but it’s a
good start and it would have been a good model for the occupy vigil to follow.
Alternatively a better way to show solidarity with the #Occupy movement would
have been to just join the actual Occupy Ann Arbor camp a few blocks down
Liberty Street. Or, student could have bought plane tickets, flown
to Davis, and made it clear that Michigan stands with the UC students there.
But that would have been kind of a 1% move, don’t you think?
Very good piece Joe. While I may be a bit biased due to the fact my blood pressure skyrockets anytime I see another pointless protest with no particular goals in mind except to protest for the sake of protest, I couldn't agree more with your position. It's very nice to see a little perspective from a UW-Madison grad, which frankly is hard to come by. Keep up the insightful, good work my friend.
ReplyDelete