Hello everyone and thanks for stopping by. We are childhood friends who grew up, graduated college, and now have our very own blog. Living the dream, right? Since kindergarten, we’ve tackled topics ranging from travel to science to sports to food to politics to technology to religion. Expect posts on all of the above and more from us, as well as a guest column or two.
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Seeing Red Over Blue Chairs
Most people
get excited when they see this picture and that’s totally understandable. It’s a clever business card, one hell of a
catchy song, and I’m sure Greg Schneider can even notice the faint hint of a watermark.
Most people, however, didn’t go to the University of Wisconsin.
Labels:
Blue Chairs,
Joe,
Memorial Union,
Union Terrace,
UW-Madison,
WUD
Evaluating the Educational Impact of the National School Lunch Program
My absence from Eleanor Ave. for the last couple months can
be explained in one word: thesis. Although, technically, it is a “professional
paper,” calling it a thesis avoids lots of additional explanation. No matter what you call it, they both involve
lots of words and lots of time.
Because my EA postings ceased as a result of this large
collection of words, I decided that I should post the final document.
Brief summary: The
National School Lunch Program (commonly referred to as “free/reduced lunch") provides
millions of meals to low income school children every day. The students
eligible for free and reduced lunches achieve at almost one standard deviation
below their peers on math and reading test scores. In this paper I ask: do low income children receive
any cognitive benefits from receiving a free or low cost meal at school? In previous research, the answer has been “no,
not really, except for select demographics on certain tests.” Many results even indicated that participation
led to lower test scores. What these researchers
did not consider is if, without out the NSLP, eligible students would receive a
meal anyway – from their parents, a sibling, a neighbor, or a food shelf. For this reason, my paper looks at low income
children who also have “low food security” – essentially an index of
hunger. For these children,
participation in the NSLP free lunch program appears to lead to positive,
statistically significant improvements in tests scores, but particularly
reading scores. However, there remain
some null and negative results which are likely attributable to the nature of
the survey questions. Additionally, the
paper provides recommendations for policymakers and future research on this
topic.
For more details about these topics, the history of the program,
and methods/models for evaluating the NSLP, check out the full paper.
Special thanks to my advisers, the Humphrey School, and the many others that helped with the editing, support, and encouragement that made this paper possible.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)